연속간행물
Medical care
- 서명/저자사항
- Medical care / [ed. by] Medical Care Section, American Public Health Association
- 발행사항
- Philadelphia [etc.] : Lippincott, 1963-
- 형태사항
- v. : ill ; 26 cm
- 현재 간행빈도
- Monthly [Feb. 1980-]
- 이전 간행빈도
- Bimonthly [Jan./Feb. 1967-] Quarterly [Jan./Mar. 1964-]
- 권연차사항
- v. 1(Jan./Mar. 1963)-
- ISSN
- 0025-7079
권호정보
기사색인
기사명 | 저자 | 페이지 | 발행일 | 첨부 | 내용보기 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Introduction: The Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative | Naylor, Mary D. | S1-S5 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
Linkages Between Nursing and the Quality of Patient Care: A 2-Year Comparison | Naylor, Mary D. | S6-S14 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
Measuring Nurses’ Impact on Health Care Quality | Beck, Susan L. | S15-S22 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
Facilitators and Challenges to Conducting Interdisciplinary Research | Corbett, Cynthia F. | S23-S31 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
Methodology Issues in Implementation Science | Newhouse, Robin | S32-S40 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
Dissemination and Implementation | Titler, Marita G. | S41-S46 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
What Can We Learn From the Existing Evidence of the Business Case for Investments in Nursing Care | Yakusheva, Olga | S47-S52 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
Limitations of Basing Screening Policies on Screening Trials | Etzioni, Ruth | 295-300 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
Counterpoint: Randomized Trials Provide the Strongest Evidence for Clinical Guidelines | Melnikow, Joy | 301-303 | 2013.04.23 | - | |
Response: Reading Between the Lines of Cancer Screening Trials | Etzioni, Ruth | 304-306 | 2013.04.23 | - |
- Introduction: The Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative
- Linkages Between Nursing and the Quality of Patient Care: A 2-Year Comparison
- Measuring Nurses’ Impact on Health Care Quality
- Facilitators and Challenges to Conducting Interdisciplinary Research
- Methodology Issues in Implementation Science
- Dissemination and Implementation
- What Can We Learn From the Existing Evidence of the Business Case for Investments in Nursing Care
- Limitations of Basing Screening Policies on Screening Trials
- Counterpoint: Randomized Trials Provide the Strongest Evidence for Clinical Guidelines
- Response: Reading Between the Lines of Cancer Screening Trials