검색 결과
Stakeholders’ Experiences Related to the Admission Review Committee After the Revision of Mental Health Welfare Act
Shin, Soyoun(Seoul National University) ; Cho, Yoon-Min(Health Insurance Research Institute) ; Yoon, Nan-He(Wonkwang University) ; Hwang, Seo Eun(SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center) ; Hwang, Jongnam(Wonkwang University) ; Choi, Jung Won(Yonsei University) ; Kim, Jandi(Seoul National University) ; Heo, Jongho(National Assembly Futures Institute) ; Lee, Sun Goo(Yonsei University) 보건사회연구 , Vol.41, No.2, pp.259-277 https://dx.doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2021.41.2.259
Abstract
The revision of the “Mental Health Act” into the “Act on the Improvement of Mental Health and the Support for Welfare Services for Mental Patients” in 2016 led to the tightening of procedures for involuntary hospitalization through the implementation of the “Committee for Review as to Legitimacy of Admission” (hereinafter “Admission Review Committee”). This study evaluated whether the Admission Review Committee has achieved its goal to promote the human rights of people with a mental illness through qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences. The evaluation is based on interviews with a total of 27 subcommittee members from all the five national psychiatric hospitals which have an Admission Review Committee in place. Those interviewed were psychiatrists, lawyers, mental health professionals, patients and their families, and investigators. As a result, a total of four categories and 16 themes emerged from the thematic analysis. Our study shows that the Admission Review Committee has promoted human rights by functioning as a minimum safeguard to prevent unjust involuntary hospitalization and forced transfer to psychiatric hospitals. However, insufficient procedural assistance has limited the right to self-determination, and the committee heavily relied on paper review rather than the face-to-face investigation with people with a mental illness. For a better supportive committee for the human rights of people with a mental illness, we suggest that the committee adopt the face-to-face review process, procedural assistance services, and a governance system closely connecting medical facilities with local communities.
초록
2016년, 구 정신보건법이 「정신건강증진 및 정신질환자 복지서비스 지원에 관한 법률」로 개정되면서, 입원적합성심사위원회(이하 입적심) 제도가 신설되고 비자의입원 절차가 강화되었다. 본 연구는 입적심의 목표인 정신질환자의 인권증진 여부를 평가하기 위해 이해관계자들의 참여경험을 질적으로 분석하고, 향후 나아갈 방안을 모색하였다. 이에 전국 5개 국립정신병원에서 입적심과 관련된 총 27명의 전문의, 법조인, 정신건강전문요원, 가족, 당사자, 조사원, 정신질환자를 심층 면담하였다. 주제분석 결과, 4개의 주제와 16개의 하위주제가 도출되었다. 입적심 제도는 부당한 비자의입원 및 강압 이송행위에 대한 안전장치를 마련하여 인권을 향상시켰지만, 대면조사보다 서류심사가 주를 이루고 의사결정지원이 미흡하여 자기결정권이 제한된다는 한계를 드러냈다. 추후 자기결정권을 보장하기 위한 대면조사와 절차보조사업을 확충하고, 의료기관과 지역사회 서비스를 연결하는 협력시스템이 구축되어야 한다.
A Qualitative Case Study on the Exercise Experience and Perceived Exercise Barriers of Childhood Cancer Survivors
Kim, Ji Young(Konkuk University) ; Yeon, Su Jin(Yonsei University) ; Byeon, Ji Yong(Yonsei University) ; Yoo, Samuel(Yonsei University) ; Lyu, Chuhl Joo(Yonsei University) ; Jeon, Justin Y.(Yonsei University) 보건사회연구 , Vol.41, No.4, pp.207-224 https://dx.doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2021.41.4.207
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the exercise experience and perceived exercise barriers of childhood cancer survivors diagnosed with cancer in childhood and adolescence, and to explore common issues and practical implications in depth. Nine adolescents who were diagnosed with childhood cancer and completed treatment were selected as study participants, and a qualitative case study was conducted to understand individual characteristics. In-depth interviews were conducted one-on-one using open-ended questions. Our results showed that the exercise participation experience was classified as ‘exercise experience before diagnosis cancer’ and ‘exercise experience after diagnosis cancer’. Before cancer diagnosis, participants of the study experienced similar exercise and physical activity (PA) participation as children and adolescents without cancer. However, during cancer treatment, their PA participation decreased dramatically, even after cancer treatment, participants do not recover their pre-diagnosis PA levels. Exercise barriers which they experienced were classified into ‘environmental constraint factors’ such as lack of exercise partner and facilities, and ‘physical constraint factors’ such as such as low fitness levels and side effect of cancer treatment. Due to these exercise barriers, participants did not meet the recommended amount of PA levels for adolescents and had an inactive lifestyle. Based on the in-depth understanding of the exercise participation experience and exercise barriers of childhood cancer survivors, various methods will be proposed about participation in regular exercise in local communities and schools for childhood cancer survivors.
초록
본 연구는 아동·청소년 시기에 암을 진단받은 소아청소년암 생존자의 개별적인 운동 경험과 운동 제약을 파악하고, 공통적으로 나타나는 이슈와 실천적 함의에 대해 심층적으로 탐색하고자 하였다. 소아청소년암을 진단받고 치료를 완료한 9명의 청소년을 연구참여자로 선정하였으며, 개인별 특수성을 이해하기 위해 질적 사례연구로 진행되었다. 개방형 질문을 사용하여 심층 면담을 1대1로 실시하였다. 운동 경험은 ‘발병 전 운동 경험’, ‘발병 후 운동 경험’으로 분류되었다. 참여자들은 암 발병 전에는 일반 청소년들과 다름없는 운동 경험을 가지고 있었지만, 진단 이후 치료 기간에 급격하게 신체활동량이 감소하였으며, 암 치료가 종료된 이후에도 이전과 같이 충분한 운동 참여를 하지 못하고 있었다. 참여자가 경험하는 운동 제약은 함께 운동할 친구 혹은 장소 부족과 같은 ‘환경적 제약 요인’과 낮은 체력 혹은 치료 후유증과 같은 ‘신체적 제약 요인’으로 분류되었다. 이러한 운동 제약으로 말미암아, 참여자들은 신체 활동 권고량을 충족하지 못하고 있었으며, 비활동적인 생활 습관을 가지고 있었다. 향후 소아청소년암 생존자의 운동 경험과 제약을 깊이 있게 이해하고, 이들이 운동에 활발하게 참여할 수 있도록 지역 사회와 학교에서 다양한 방안을 모색해야 할 것이다.
A Qualitative Case Study on the Life of Dismissed Airline Workers: Focused on the Dismissal Experience of Low-cost Carrier Cockpit Crew
Kim, Hyun Sook(Sungkyunkwan University) ; Kang, Jun Hyeok(Eulji University) ; Lee, Hyuk Koo(Sungkyunkwan University) 보건사회연구 , Vol.41, No.4, pp.313-333 https://dx.doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2021.41.4.313
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to delve into the lives of dismissed airline workers. For this, a total of 4 participants were selected, and data were collected through 1:1 in-depth interviews. The collected data were analyzed by applying Creswell’s (2013) case study method. According to the research procedure, first, ‘the context of the lives of dismissed airline workers’ was individually revealed through ‘within-case analysis’. Second, a total of 15 integration topics between cases were extracted through ‘cross-case analysis’. Results show that they revealed their lives before dismissal as ‘the job they dreamed of’, ‘what they were proud of’, ‘satisfied with one’s job’, ‘sensing that something is wrong’. After the dismissal, the participants suffered from ‘concerns becoming a reality’, ‘thrown away in the open sea’. ‘relative deprivation’, ‘sadness from criticism’, ‘fury on unfairness’, ‘over-the-counter struggles’, ‘out into the part-time job battlefront’, ‘appreciation for family’, ‘struggles to keep one’s place’, ‘avoiding extreme choices’, ‘broken rice bowl’, and ‘change of perspective on labor’. Based on these findings, researchers suggested the need for an integrated institution that can provide psychological support services for dismissed airline workers, support self-help groups, and provide jobs as well as education to dismissed airline crews. In addition, they proposed the development and application of welfare policies that reflect the necessity of the aviation crew (airline workers) mutual aid association and the characteristics of the aviation industry.
초록
본 연구의 목적은 항공사 해고승무원들의 삶을 탐구하는 데 있다. 이를 위해 총 4명의 운항승무원을 참여자로 선정하였고, 1:1 심층면담을 통해 자료를 수집했다. 수집된 자료는 Creswell(2013)이 제시한 사례연구 방법을 적용하여 분석하였다. 연구 절차에 따라 첫째, ‘사례 내 분석’을 통해 ‘항공사 해고승무원의 삶의 맥락’을 개별적으로 드러냈다. 둘째, ‘사례 간 분석’을 통해 총 15개의 사례 간 통합 주제를 추출했다. 분석 결과 ‘꿈꿔왔던 일’, ‘자부심 가득했던 일’, ‘새 직장에 만족함’, ‘무언가 이상이 있음을 감지함’이라는 해고 이전의 삶을 드러내었다. 그리고 해고 이후 참여자들은 ‘우려가 현실이 됨’, ‘망망대해에 내던져짐’, ‘상대적 박탈감’, ‘비난에 대한 서글픔’, ‘억울함’, ‘내 자리를 지키려는 투쟁’, ‘아르바이트 전선으로’, ‘가족에 대한 고마움’, ‘극단적 선택을 회피함’, ‘깨진 철밥통’, ‘노동에 대한 관점의 전환’이라는 어려움을 겪고 있었다. 연구자들은 이와 같은 연구 결과를 바탕으로 항공사 해고노동자들을 위한 심리적 지원서비스 제공, 자조모임 지원, 해고승무원 일자리 제공 및 교육 등이 가능한 통합기관의 필요성을 제시하였다. 또한, 항공승무원(항공종사자) 공제회 필요성 제시 및 항공업계의 특성이 반영된 복지정책 개발과 적용을 제안했다.