이 연구에서는 과부담의료비의 발생규모 및 특성을 알아보고, 저소득층의 과부담의료비 발생에 영향을 미치는 요인을 파악하고자 하였다. 한국복지패널 1차년도 자료(2006)를 이용하여 총 6,992가구를 대상으로 지불능력 대비 의료비 부담이 각각 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% 이상일 때의 가구별 과부담의료비 지출빈도를 파악하고, 중위소득 60% 미만의 저소득층 3,233가구를 대상으로 과부담의료비발생에 영향을 미치는 요인을 알아보기 위하여 로지스틱 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 전체 가구에서 과부담의료비 발생률은 기준(threshold)이 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%일 때 각각 19.1%, 9.7%, 5.8%, 3.7%로 나타났으며, 저소득가구의 과부담의료비 발생률은 각 각 32.2%, 19.5%, 12.0%, 7.8%로 일반가구에 비해 저소득가구에서 현저히 높게 나타났다. 가구주가 여성, 노인, 미취업자일 때, 교육수준이 낮을 때, 배우자가 없을 때, 주관적 건강상태가 좋지 않을 때 및 가구의 소득수준이 낮은 경우, 가구원 중 만성질환자가 있는 경우, 5세 이하 아동이 없는 경우, 가구원 수가 적을수록 과부담의료비 발생위험이 높았으며 의료보장 유형이 의료급여인 집단보다 건강보험인 집단에서 더 높게 나타났다. 과부담의료비의 발생이 일반가구에 비해 저소득가구에서 훨씬 높게 나타난 것은 우리사회의 의료보장제도가 보장성이 낮으며 따라서 많은 가구를 빈곤으로 가게 할 수 있는 위험이 존재한다는 것을 뜻한다. 특히 소득이 낮으면서 의료급여 혜택을 받지 못하고 있는 차상위계층의 과부담의료비 발생이 심각한 것으로 나타났다.;This study examines the scale of occurrence of Catastrophic Health Expenditure (CHE), and identifies the factors influencing CHE among low-income households. Korea Welfare Panel (KOWEP) (2006) were used in the study. CHE is defined by when the households' medical spending out of ability to pay exceeds 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%. The study examined the frequency of CHE with 6,992 households, Moreover, among 3,233 low-income households whose income amounts to less than 60% of the median income, logistic regression was conducted. The occurrence of CHE in the entire household appeared to be 19.1%, 9.7%, .8%, and 3.7% with the threshold at 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%. For the low-income households, it accounted for 32.2%, 19.5%, 12.0%, and 7.8%, which showed a significant increase compare to the average households. The following cases showed high chances of incurring CHE: When the householder is female, older than 65, unemployed, less educated, has no spouse, has poor perceived health status, has a low income, has chronic sufferers in the family, has no child under five years old, and has a small number of family members. It also showed that those with national health insurance as a form of medical security rated higher than those with medical aid. The higher incidence of CHE among low-income households implies that South Korea offers a low level of medical security, which can drive its people to poverty.
본 연구의 목적은 우리나라 인구의 1/4이 거주하는 서울시에서 건강수준의 불평등과 관련된 지표를 이용하여 사회계층간 건강수준의 차이를 대표성 높은 서울시민보건지표조사 자료를 이용하여 실증적으로 분석하고, 유병수준과 관련된 사회경제적 요인과 건강행태 요인들의 영향을 분석하고자 하였다. 연구자료는 2001년 서울시민보건지표조사 자료로서 2,500개 조사구에서 조사된 25~64세 인구 16,180명을 대상으로 하였다. 통계분석은 다변량 로지스틱 회귀분석을 이용하였다. 건강수준으로는 만성질환 유무와 주관적 건강수준의 두가지 유병수준 지표를 선정하였으며, 사회계층변수로는 교육수준, 가구 월소득수준, 직업유형을, 건행태요인으로는 흡연, 음주, 비만, 운동, 아침식사 결식여부, 수면적절성 등의 6가지 변수를 선정하였다. 연구 결과 남녀 모두 낮은 교육수준, 낮은 소득수준, 낮은 직업계층의 집단에서 만성질환 유병의 위험도와 주관적 건강수준이 나쁠 위험도가 뚜렷하게 증가하였다. 남녀 모두 사회계층 변수 중 교육수준이 만성질환과 주관적 건강수준에 미치는 영향이 컸다. 사회계층 요인과 건강행태 요인이 모두 유병수준에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나 사회계층 요인의 영향이 더욱 컸다. 주관적 건강상태는 만성질환에서 보다 사회계층에 따른 불평등도가 더욱 컸으며, 남자가 여자에 비하여 사회계층에 따른 주관적 건강상태의 불평등도가 심하였다. 결론적으로 우리나라 서울시 인구집단에서 사회계층간 만성질환과 주관적 건강수준에서 상당한 불평등이 존재하는 것으로 파악되었다.;This study aims to investigate socioeconomic differences in morbidity in Seoul Metropolitan. The study consists of a representative sample of 16,180 adult men and women aged 20~64 who participated in the 2001 Seoul Citizens’ Health Interview Survey. This population-based crosssectional survey data was used to investigate the effects of education, income and occupation on the prevalence of self-reported chronic illness from all causes and self-rated health. To estimate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of self-reported chronic illness and self-rated health a multiple logistic analysis was conducted. For both men and women, the study shows that socioeconomic position(SEP) is strongly related with risk of self-reported chronic illness and self-rated health at all levels of the SEP hierarchy, that is, lower education and income led to a significant increase in morbidity. After controlling for age and 6 health behavioral risk factors(duration of smoking, alcohol drinking, relative body weight, physical activity, skipping breakfast and sleeping pattern), the odds ratio of self-reported chronic illness for men was 1.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49- 2.47), for women 1.89 (95% CI, 1.54-2.32) among those with the lowesteducated group compared to the highest-educated group. When household income was considered, after controlling for age and 6 behavioral risk factors, the odds ratio of chronic diseases for men was 1.12 (95% CI 0.93-1.35), and for women 1.62 (95% CI 1.39-1.89) among those in the lowest-income group compared to the highest-income group. The odds ratio of self-rated health after controlling for age and 6 behavioral risk factors was 2.41 (95% CI, 1.78-3.25) for men, 2.05 (95% CI, 1.63-2.58) for women among those with the lowest-educated group compared to the highest-educated group. When household income was considered, after controlling for age and 6 behavioral risk factors, the odds ratio of self-rated health for men was 1.63 (95% CI 1.25-2.13), and 1.32 (95% CI, 1.09-1.58) for women among those in the lowest-income group compared to the highest-income group. This study finds that there exist large socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity in Seoul Metropolitan area. To be more specific, socioeconomic differences for men are larger in self-rated health, but smaller in chronic illness than women. Also, the effect of education is stronger than that of income for both men and women. The study results are similar to previous studies on social inequalities in health status for Korea and other developed countries.
본 연구는 남아선호 의식과 행위간 관계를 설정하고, 결정요인을 분석함으로써 출생성비 불균형의 원인을 규명하고자 하였다. 『2000년도 전국 출산력 및 가족보건실태조사』를 이용한 로지스틱 분석결과, 자녀수와 남아수, 최장거주지, 종교, 문화적 요인으로 아들의 호주상속관에 대한 가치관, 지역환경요인으로 영남권과 중부권이 남아선호 의식과 행위간 관계에 중요한 영향을 미치고 있다. 연령, 가구유형, 부인 및 남편의 교육정도, 남편의 종교, 취업상태, 가구소득, 호남권은 통계적으로 무의미하였다. 도시부인의 경우 남아를 선호하지 않으며 태아성검사도 수용하지 않는 경향이 높고, 남아를 선호하면 태아성검사를 수용하는 경향이 높았다. 기독교에 비해 무종교부인이 남아를 선호하지 않는 경우 태아성검사를 수용하지 않으나, 남아를 선호한 경우에는 수용하지 않은 경향이 더 낮았다. 아들의 호주상속에 대한 가치관의 약화는 남아선호는 물론 태아성검사 수용을 억제하는 방향으로 영향을 미치고 있다. 영남지역 부인은 지역환경의 영향으로 남아선호 여부와 관계없이 태아성검사를 수용하는 경향이 높았다. 중부권도 그 정도는 낮으나, 유사한 경향을 보였다. 분석결과를 토대로 다음과 같은 시사점을 도출할 수 있다. 첫째, 출생성비 불균형관련 학술적 연구나 정책적 노력은 남아선호도와 함께 남아출산수단의 수용태도 및 결정요인에 중점을 둘 필요가 있다. 둘째, 농촌부인에 대한 집중적인 홍보가 필요한 한편, 도시부인의 남아선호가 남아출산수단의 수용으로 귀결되므로, 도시여성의 남아선호관을 불식시키는 노력도 중요하다. 호주상속관련 법·제도는 물론 남녀평등 구현을 위한 사회·경제적 개혁이 중요하다. 셋째, 영남지역의 사회문화적 환경은 부인의 남아선호뿐만 아니라 태아성검사 수용을 증가시키는 역할을 하고 있다. 이와 관련, 남편, 노부모(시부모) 등에 대한 집중적인 홍보가 중요하다. 부인 및 가족의 남아를 얻기 위한 욕구실현을 좌절시키기 위해 의료기관을 계몽하는 한편, 불법적 의료시술 의사를 엄격히 처벌한다. 불법시술의 감시·적발을 위해 시민단체 등을 적극 활용한다.;The current study aims to establish the relationship between son preference and related practices, and, by analyzing the determinants thereof based on logistic analysis of the data from 2000 National Fertility and Family Health Survey, to identify the causes of the distorted sex ratio at birth in Korea. Some of the major findings are as follows. Among urban married women, those who do not hold son preference are not likely to make use of fetal sex screening while those who do had a high tendency to make use of fetal sex screening. In the case of urban married women without son preference, non-religious women as compared with Christian women are found to be less likely to make use of fetal sex screening. The waning of the social values that excludes women from succeeding a family headship is found to exert some influence on married women to curb their desire for fetal sex screening as well as their son preference. Married women in Youngnam region (the southeastern area of Korea), whether or not holding son preference themselves, generally had a high tendency to make use of fetal sex screening in order to have a son-selective childbirth because of its prevailing background ethos favoring sons. The following implications can be drawn from the results of the study. First, academic researches and policy efforts to redress the unbalanced sex rate at birth need to pay particular heed to peoples’ son-selective reproductive behaviors and related determinants. Second, there is a need for publicity efforts intensively targeting rural married women. Also, since son preference among urban married women is likely to lead them adopt son-selective childbirth strategies, substantial effort is required to be made with a view to reducing, and gradually eliminating, their son-preferential attitudes. To do this would involve taking prudent socioeconomic reform measures conducive to realizing equality between men and women. Also, legal reform measures must be taken against the current institutions of family headship system. Third, the socio-cultural climate of Youngnam region tends to cultivate and further son- preference sentiment among married women and therefore foster their tendency to make use of fetal sex screening. In this regard, intensive publicity efforts are required in order to change the son-preference attitude of husbands and parents (parents-in-law in particular). Forth, to foil the attempts of married women and their families to choose sex-selective abortions in favor of a son, there must be public efforts to inculcate medical institutions with the importance of redressing the current unbalanced sex ratio at birth. Such efforts must be combined with severe sanctions against illegal medical surgeries associated with sex-selective childbirths. In addition, NGO monitoring of, and reporting on, such illegal practices must be encouraged.
최근 자원으로서의 시간에 대한 개인의 인식은 인간의 생활을 영위하는 기초적 단위로서 시간의 가치활용도를 높이고 인간관계의 맥락을 심화시키며, 그들의 「삶의 질」을 극대화하는 핵심적인 가치를 부여하는데 초점을 맞추고 있다. 그렇지만 어느 누구에게나 정해져 있는 시간의 양(quantity)을 어떻게 효율적으로 사용하고, 필요한 분야 및 항목에 얼마나 배분하는가에 따라 시간의 질(quality)을 증대시킬 수 있다. 본 연구는 1999년 통계청에서 처음으로 실시한 자료를 심층 분석하는 것이다. 연구목적은 기혼여성의 혼인상태 및 사회경제적 특성에 따라 생활시간 배분이 어떻게 상이한지를 분석하고 문제점을 찾으며, 아울러 효율적 시간활용방안을 제시하고 정책적 지원방안도 함께 모색하는데 있다. 주요 결과는 우리나라 기혼여성의 생활시간 배분은 혼인상태에 따라 현저한 차이가 있었다는 점이다. 아울러 기혼여성의 경제활동여부도 생활시간 배분에 영향을 크게 미치고 있었다. 특히 이혼부인은 생계유지를 위하여 경제활동에 적극 참여해야 하기 때문에 적절한 시간배분에 문제점을 노출시키고 있었다. 이와 같은 일련의 분석연구는 우리나라 부인의 혼인상태, 연령, 경제활동참여 및 직업유형 등의 특성에 따라 생활방식과 삶의 질을 파악하고, 시간자원을 효율적으로 활용하는 데 필요한 기초자료로 제공될 수 있을 것이며, 궁극적으로 여성의 「삶의 질」을 향상시키는 데 기여할 것으로 사료된다.;Individual's view of time as resource has recently been geared toward making the best use of time as the basic unit of human life in order to deepen the context of interpersonal relationships and maximize quality of life. The quality of one's time can be enhanced depending on how efficiently one allocate, manage, and spend the quantity of time. The present study aims to conduct an in depth examination of the first time-allocation survey carried out in Korea by the National Statistical Office in 1999 and analyze differences and identify problems in time allocation among married women according to their marital status and socioeconomic characteristics. Along the way, strategic plans and policy implications are suggested for improving the efficiency of time allocation. Major findings can be summarized as follows. Patterns of time allocation among married women in Korea vary widely depending on their marital status. The largest portion of their time in general is spent on ‘self-care’ which includes time allocated for sleep. However, divorced women are found to spend the next largest portion of their time on work, while widowed women and women with spouse spend the second largest portion their time on 'leisure and friends/acquaintances'. Divorced women are found to spend significantly more time at work than widowed women and women with spouse do. This is presumably a result stemming from the fact that divorced women, unlike women with spouse present, are highly responsible for household livelihood not only because they do not have income-earning husbands, but also because they are generally younger than their widowed counterparts and therefore are less likely to have income-earning children. Divorced and widowed women in their thirties/forties as compared with other groups are found to spend much more time on work. This may be not only because they unlike women with spouse present－must fulfill their responsibilities and role as the main breadwinner for the family, but also because they are more likely to have school-aged children and are responsible for earning money for bringing up and educating them. Unemployed women, regardless of their marital status, are found to spend more time on household and family care than employed women. This implies that there is an accentuated policy need for paying particular heed to social support toward helping divorced women balance their work and family lives. Koreans in general－irrespective of socio-demographic factors such as gender, age, educational level, marital status, and employment status－are found to devote little time to voluntary activities, even during weekends or holidays. Non-working women and elderly people, in particular, spend very limited amount of time participating in voluntary activities despite having relatively much spare time. Divorced and widowed women as compared to women with spouse are found to suffer from lack of time to care for their preschool children due to other obligations. This calls for more policy attention to be placed on the protection of physical and emotional health of children in these female-headed households. For instance, the availability/accessibility of desired services should be ensured through the expansion of home-helper programs, educare centers, and financial aid programs. Based on these results, the following time management strategies and policy options can be considered. First, more time needs to be allocated, especially in the case of married non-working women, to voluntary activities. This can be made possible by reducing time spent on friends/acquaintances, leisure activities, and self-care. Second, it is hard for many divorced and widowed women to allocate much time to household and family care because they are responsible for engaging in income-earning activities. Therefore, social support should be provided to enhance the availability and accessibility of home-helper programs and daycare services. Third, cultural/leisure programs should be developed for working married women who generally have little or no time for leisure and interpersonal relationships. Forth, the longstanding inequalities in gender roles must be redressed. To do this would require men to escape from their traditional ‘male gender role’ and assume an increased, if not equal, role in household tasks and family care.