본 연구는 한국의 복지현황 및 발전 수준을 보여줄 수 있는 복지지표체계를 개발하고자 하는 목적에서 출발한다. 기존의 단편적이고 비이론적인 복지지표들을 넘어 체계적이고 견고한 이론적 토대를 가진 복지지표체계를 개발함으로써, 현재의 복지 상황을 이해하고 복지발전 수준을 통합적으로 평가할 수 있는 준거틀을 제시하는 것이 본 연구의 주요한 목적이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 OECD의 사회지표 분석틀을 기반으로 하되 한국 상황에의 적합성을 고려, 수정한 새로운 복지지표 분석틀을 제안하였다. 한국의 복지지표 분석틀은 3가지 분류기준을 포함하는데, 첫째, ‘PSR(Pressure - State - Response)’모형에 따른 사회적 맥락(social context), 사회적 상황(social status), 복지노력(welfare efforts)이다. 둘째, 사회정책의 목표기준으로 OECD의 사회지표 분석틀에서 제안한 자립, 형평성, 건강, 사회응집에 더하여 지속가능성을 포함, 총 5가지 정책목표를 제시하였다. 셋째, 생애주기별 기준을 사용하여 아동·청소년기(0-24세), 성인기(25-64세), 그리고 노년기(65세 이상) 세 가지 생애주기로 구분하였다. 기존의 복지지표를 분류하는 기준들이 일정한 기준이나 이론적 근거 없이 인구집단, 제도 혹은 사업, 정책목표 등의 기준들이 혼재되어 있는 상황에서, 논리적이고 이론적인 근거를 가진 복지지표체계를 구성하고자 시도한 이 연구는 한국의 복지지표체계 구축에 중요한 방향성을 제시할 뿐 아니라 추후 OECD 등의 사회지표체계 논의에도 기여할 것이다.;This study aims to develop a new conceptual framework of welfare indicators in Korea. By developing a system of welfare indicators which is a theoretically well-grounded as well as methodologically sound, this research aims to propose a new framework to be used to monitor and analyse the development of welfare and quality of life as well as general trends of social change in Korea. This research proposed a new system of welfare indicators on the basis of the OECD social indicator framework. This framework has three dimensions. The first dimension considers the nature of these indicators, grouping them in three areas - social context, social status, societal response - which is similar to “Pressure-State-Response(PSR)”approach. Social context indicators are crucial for understanding the broader social policy context. Social status indicators describe the social outcomes that policies try to influence. Social response indicators provide information about what society is doing to affect social status indicators. In our framework, we used the ‘welfare effort’instead of ‘societal response’to put its emphasis on the government’s efforts. The second dimension groups indicators according to the broad objectives of social policy - self sufficiency, equity, health status, social cohesion. In our framework, we added sustainability to policy objectives list. The third dimension groups indicators according to life-cycle - children under 24 years old, adults from 25 to 64 years old, the aged over 65 years old. This framework for welfare indicators is systemic and coherent, so it will be helpful for the development of welfare statistics.
최근 자원으로서의 시간에 대한 개인의 인식은 인간의 생활을 영위하는 기초적 단위로서 시간의 가치활용도를 높이고 인간관계의 맥락을 심화시키며, 그들의 「삶의 질」을 극대화하는 핵심적인 가치를 부여하는데 초점을 맞추고 있다. 그렇지만 어느 누구에게나 정해져 있는 시간의 양(quantity)을 어떻게 효율적으로 사용하고, 필요한 분야 및 항목에 얼마나 배분하는가에 따라 시간의 질(quality)을 증대시킬 수 있다. 본 연구는 1999년 통계청에서 처음으로 실시한 자료를 심층 분석하는 것이다. 연구목적은 기혼여성의 혼인상태 및 사회경제적 특성에 따라 생활시간 배분이 어떻게 상이한지를 분석하고 문제점을 찾으며, 아울러 효율적 시간활용방안을 제시하고 정책적 지원방안도 함께 모색하는데 있다. 주요 결과는 우리나라 기혼여성의 생활시간 배분은 혼인상태에 따라 현저한 차이가 있었다는 점이다. 아울러 기혼여성의 경제활동여부도 생활시간 배분에 영향을 크게 미치고 있었다. 특히 이혼부인은 생계유지를 위하여 경제활동에 적극 참여해야 하기 때문에 적절한 시간배분에 문제점을 노출시키고 있었다. 이와 같은 일련의 분석연구는 우리나라 부인의 혼인상태, 연령, 경제활동참여 및 직업유형 등의 특성에 따라 생활방식과 삶의 질을 파악하고, 시간자원을 효율적으로 활용하는 데 필요한 기초자료로 제공될 수 있을 것이며, 궁극적으로 여성의 「삶의 질」을 향상시키는 데 기여할 것으로 사료된다.;Individual's view of time as resource has recently been geared toward making the best use of time as the basic unit of human life in order to deepen the context of interpersonal relationships and maximize quality of life. The quality of one's time can be enhanced depending on how efficiently one allocate, manage, and spend the quantity of time. The present study aims to conduct an in depth examination of the first time-allocation survey carried out in Korea by the National Statistical Office in 1999 and analyze differences and identify problems in time allocation among married women according to their marital status and socioeconomic characteristics. Along the way, strategic plans and policy implications are suggested for improving the efficiency of time allocation. Major findings can be summarized as follows. Patterns of time allocation among married women in Korea vary widely depending on their marital status. The largest portion of their time in general is spent on ‘self-care’ which includes time allocated for sleep. However, divorced women are found to spend the next largest portion of their time on work, while widowed women and women with spouse spend the second largest portion their time on 'leisure and friends/acquaintances'. Divorced women are found to spend significantly more time at work than widowed women and women with spouse do. This is presumably a result stemming from the fact that divorced women, unlike women with spouse present, are highly responsible for household livelihood not only because they do not have income-earning husbands, but also because they are generally younger than their widowed counterparts and therefore are less likely to have income-earning children. Divorced and widowed women in their thirties/forties as compared with other groups are found to spend much more time on work. This may be not only because they unlike women with spouse present－must fulfill their responsibilities and role as the main breadwinner for the family, but also because they are more likely to have school-aged children and are responsible for earning money for bringing up and educating them. Unemployed women, regardless of their marital status, are found to spend more time on household and family care than employed women. This implies that there is an accentuated policy need for paying particular heed to social support toward helping divorced women balance their work and family lives. Koreans in general－irrespective of socio-demographic factors such as gender, age, educational level, marital status, and employment status－are found to devote little time to voluntary activities, even during weekends or holidays. Non-working women and elderly people, in particular, spend very limited amount of time participating in voluntary activities despite having relatively much spare time. Divorced and widowed women as compared to women with spouse are found to suffer from lack of time to care for their preschool children due to other obligations. This calls for more policy attention to be placed on the protection of physical and emotional health of children in these female-headed households. For instance, the availability/accessibility of desired services should be ensured through the expansion of home-helper programs, educare centers, and financial aid programs. Based on these results, the following time management strategies and policy options can be considered. First, more time needs to be allocated, especially in the case of married non-working women, to voluntary activities. This can be made possible by reducing time spent on friends/acquaintances, leisure activities, and self-care. Second, it is hard for many divorced and widowed women to allocate much time to household and family care because they are responsible for engaging in income-earning activities. Therefore, social support should be provided to enhance the availability and accessibility of home-helper programs and daycare services. Third, cultural/leisure programs should be developed for working married women who generally have little or no time for leisure and interpersonal relationships. Forth, the longstanding inequalities in gender roles must be redressed. To do this would require men to escape from their traditional ‘male gender role’ and assume an increased, if not equal, role in household tasks and family care.