본 연구는 의사결정트리를 이용하여 성인의 미충족 치과의료 경험의 영향 요인을 파악하고, 미충족 치과의료 경험 가능성이 높은 위험집단 및 치과의료 미충족 이유에 따른 집단을 분류하여 그 특성을 분석하였다. 자료는 제6기(2013~2015년) 국민건강영양조사의 만 19세 이상 성인 15,918명이며, 연구에 이용된 변수는 인구사회학적 특성, 건강행태적 특성, 정신인지적 특성, 건강관련 특성, 구강건강 특성 등이다. 자료는 복합표본분석, 의사결정트리, 로지스틱회귀 분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과 미충족 치과의료에 미치는 영향 요인은 저작불편호소가 가장 중요한 요인이었으며 다음으로 가구소득수준, 스트레스, 연령, 경제활동 상태, 고할압 의사진단 등의 순으로 나타났다. 저작불편을 호소하고 가구소득 수준이 낮은 65세 이상의 보험급여 가입자 그룹의 미충족 치과의료 경험이 67.8%로 전체 미충족 치과의료 경험률 31.3% 대비 두 배 이상 높았다. 또한 미충족 치과의료의 이유를 의료접근성 모형의 단계에 따라 위험집단의 특성을 파악해 본 결과, 의료필요의 인지(12.5%), 의료추구(21.8%), 의료도달(27.0%), 의료이용(36.9%)의 단계에 이를수록 미충족 치과의료의 이유에 대한 분율이 높았다. 본 연구는 미충족 치과의료의 영향요인과 이유를 체계적으로 분석하기 위해 의료접근성 모형 및 의사결정트리를 이용하여 위험집단을 분류하고 이들의 특성을 파악하였다. 치과의료 접근성 향상을 위해서는 미충족 치과의료 위험집단의 특성별로 의료인지, 의료추구 단계에서부터 보건교육, 사회적 지지 등의 개입이 필요하다.;The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors affecting the unmet dental care of adults using decision trees and to classify them according to the risk group of unmet dental care and the group of reasons for unmet dental care. The data are 15,918 adults aged 19 and over in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey during the 6th period (2013 - 2015). The variables used in the study were socio-demographic characteristics, health behavior characteristics, mental health characteristics, oral health characteristics. Data were analyzed by composite sample, decision tree, and logistic regression analysis. The results of this study are as follows. Dental complaints such as mastication discomfort were the most important factors affecting unmet dental care, followed by household income level, stress, age, economic activity status. 67.8% of those who have a complaint of mastication discomfort, low income and medical aid-insured group 65 years old or older experienced unmet dental care. This is over two times compared with overall unmet dental care experience 31.3%. In addition, the reason for the unmet dental care was classified according to the stages of the access model to health care. The results were as follows: recognition of dental needs (12.5%), dental care pursuit (21.8%), dental reach (27.0%), and use of dental care (36.9%). This study analyzed systematically the factors and reasons of unmet dental care using a health care access model and decision tree analysis. In order to improve accessibility of dental care, interventions such as health education and social support are needed for each type of unmet dental health risk group, especially classified according to early stages of access to health care such as first stage of perception of needs and desire for care and second stage of health care seeking.
본 연구는 대학생의 SNS중독경향성과 대인관계문제 간의 관계에서 사회적 지지의 3가지 하위요인인 가족지지, 친구지지, 중요타인지지 각각이 갖는 조절효과를 확인하기 위하여 실시되었다. 이를 위하여 서울에 소재한 A대학, 경기도 소재의 B대학, 강원도 소재의 C대학 총 3곳의 대학교 1학년부터 4학년의 남녀 대학생을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. SNS를 이용하지 않거나 응답이 불충분한 설문을 제외하고 총 315부의 자료를 분석에 사용하였다. 위계적 회귀분석을 사용하여 검증한 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, SNS중독경향성 및 가족지지, 친구지지, 중요타인지지 모두 대인관계문제에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 요인으로 제시되었는데, SNS중독경향성은 정적으로, 가족지지, 친구지지, 중요타인지지는 부적으로 영향을 미쳤다. 둘째, SNS중독경향성과 대인관계문제와의 관계에서 가족지지는 유의미한 조절효과를 나타냈다. 셋째, SNS중독경향성과 대인관계문제와의 관계에서 친구지지는 유의미한 조절효과를 나타냈다. 넷째, 중요타인지지는 대학생의 SNS중독경향성과 대인관계문제와의 관계에서 유의미한 조절효과를 보이지 않았다. 본 연구결과를 토대로 SNS중독경향성이 있는 대학생들이 겪게 되는 대인관계문제의 예방과 완화를 위해, 가족과 친구로부터 사회적 지지를 강화하고 유지시켜 나갈 수 있는 보다 실질적인 개입을 위해 제언하였다.;This study was conducted to find out the moderating effect of each of three sub-factors of social support, family’s support, friends’ support and important others’ support in college students’ SNS addiction tendency and interpersonal problems. For this purpose, a survey was conducted with male and female freshmen to seniors at three universities, University A located in Seoul, University B in Gyeonggi-do and University C in Gangwon-do. Excluding the questionnaires of students who did not use an SNS or responded inadequately, 315 copies of data were used in an analysis. The main results of a study of verification using a hierarchical regression analysis are as follows: First, all SNS addiction tendency and family’s support, friends’ support, important others’ support were suggested as factors having significant impacts on interpersonal problems, and SNS addiction tendency had a positive impact while family’s support, friends’ support and important others’ support had negative impacts. Second, in the relationship between SNS addiction tendency and interpersonal problems, family’s support showed a significant moderating effect. Third, in the relationship between SNS addiction tendency and interpersonal problems, friends’ support showed a significant moderating effect. Fourth, important others’ support did not show any significant moderating effect in the relationship between college students’ SNS addiction tendency and their interpersonal problems. Based on the results of this study, suggestions were made for the prevention and mitigation of interpersonal problems college students with SNS addiction tendency come to experience and for more practical intervention to strengthen and maintain social support from their family and friends.
본고는 공산주의 이후 러시아 복지개혁의 핵심인 연금개혁의 과정과 과제를 고찰하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 소비에트 복지시스템, 소비에트 시기 연금실태와 문제점, 연금개혁의 과정과 그 배경, 개혁과정에서 노정된 여러 과제들을 분석하였으며, 이를 토대로 대안을 제시하고 개혁의 성공여부를 전망했다. 그 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공산주의 이후 동유럽과 구 소비에트연방 국가는 연금개혁을 조기에 성공시킨 반면 러시아는 실패했다. 옐친정부의 급진적이고 비타협적인 경제개혁으로 실업, 빈곤, 불평등과 같은 심각한 부작용이 발생했고, 이로 인한 비토세력과의 갈등으로 정책적 교착상태에 빠져 연금개혁이 무산되었기 때문이다. 옐친정부의 무능으로 실패한 연금개혁은 옐친을 계승한 푸틴의 강력한 정치리더십과 경제호전에 힘입어 2002년에야 이루어졌다. 둘째, 러시아 연금개혁이 푸틴정부의 공이긴 하지만, 옐친정부의 1991년 연금공단 신설과 1998년 연금개혁안이 있었기 때문에 비교적 용이하게 추진되었다. 푸틴정부의 2002년 연금개혁은 공산주의 이후 러시아 연금개혁의 연속선상에 있다. 셋째, 2002년 개혁으로 연금시스템은 기존의 부과방식과 새로운 적립방식이 혼합된 3층 구조, 즉 기초연금, 명목확정기여연금, 개인계정으로 재편되었다. 이러한 정책결정에는 월드뱅크의 조언과 권고가 큰 영향을 미쳤다. 넷째, 연금개혁의 성공을 위해 해결되어야 할 주요 과제로는 연금수급연령의 상향조정, 지나치게 관대한 조기퇴직의 통제, 연금 수준의 현실화, 연금혜택 불평등성의 개선, 개인계정 적립금 투자수익의 증대 등이 있다. 다섯째, 러시아 연금개혁에는 고령화, 인플레, 저임금, 실업, 제도개혁에 필요한 추가지출 등 재정에 부정적인 변수와 연금수급연령의 상향조정, 조기퇴직의 개선, 적립금 투자수익률의 향상을 통한 재정안정과 같은 긍정적 변수가 공존해 있다. 연금개혁의 성공여부는 경제성장과 같은 거시경제에 달려있는데, 석유수출의존형 경제는 그 전망을 흐리게 만든다.;This paper aims at reviewing the process and the issues of the Russian pension reforms in the Post-Communism. For the purpose, the soviet welfare system, the conditions and problems of the soviet pension system, its process and background of the pension reform, and its critical issues were analysed. On the analysis, some alternatives were proposed, and the future was prospected. The results are as follows. First, the russian pension reform in the post-communism was failed contrary to the success of the Eastern European and the former Soviet Federation States in the welfare reforms including the pension. A critical reason of the failure was Yeltsin government’s incompetency. Yeltsin’s economic reform was too radical that it made serious social problems such as unemployment, poor and inequality. Because of these reverse effects, the veto forces were organized, and political conflicts with them resulted in the reform stagnation and the failure of the pension reform. After all, Putin who had strong leadership and achieved economic recovery could reform the russian pension system in 2002. Second, it is not true that the success of the pension reform is totally Putin’s even though Putin could reform the pension system Yeltsin has failed. Because Putin’s success of the 2002 pension reform owed the establishment of the Pension Fund of Russia(PFR) in 1991 and the pension reform proposition in 1998 which were made by Yeltsin government. This means that Putin’s pension reform succeeded Yeltsin’s efforts. Third, according to the pension reform 2002 of Putin government, the russian pension system was restructured to the three-tier system composing of the basic pension, the nominally defined contributory pension and the individual accounts. This policy determination was influenced by the World Bank’s advices. Fourth, the future of the russian pension reform has many issues such as upward adjusting the age of pension benefit, controlling too much generous early-retirement, realizing the level of pension benefits, improving the inequality of pension benefits, and increasing the interest rate of the individual accounts. Fifth, there are negative as well as positive variables in the russian pension reform. Negative ones are ageing society, inflation, low income, unemployment, and additional expenditure for institutional improvement of the pension system. Positive ones are institutional improvements in the age of pension benefit, the early-retirement, and the pension fund management. And the success of the pension reform depends on the russian macro economy. However, the oil and gas export economy of russia makes the perspective of the pension reform not clear.
본 연구는 중 · 고등학생 75,643명을 조사한 ‘2011년 청소년 건강행태 온라인 조사’의 원시자료를 이용하여, 청소년의 직 · 간접흡연이 천명 및 천식에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지를 분석한 것이다. 로지스틱 회귀분석을 실시하여 교차비(Odds Ratio)를 살펴 본 결과, 흡연량 및 간접흡연 노출량이 증가할수록 천명 및 천식 발생이 통계적으로 유의하게 증가하였다. 즉, 평생 천명 발생 확률은 비흡연자에 비해 일 1개비 이하 흡연자 1.24배, 일 2~9개비 흡연자 1.61배, 일 10개비 이상 흡연자는 2.11배 증가하였고, 간접흡연에 따라서는 비노출 군에 비해 주 1~4일 노출 군 1.16배, 주 5일 이상 노출 군에서 1.3배 증가하였다. 현재 천명 발생 확률은 비흡연자에 비해 일 1개비 이하 흡연자 1.45배, 일 2~9개비 흡연자 2.12배, 일 10개비 이상 흡연자는 3.13배 증가하였고, 간접흡연에 따라서는 비노출 군에 비해 주 1~4일 노출 군 1.11배, 주 5일 이상 노출된 집단에서 1.39배 증가하였다. 평생 천식 발생 확률은 비흡연자에 비해 일 10개비 이상 흡연자에서 1.37배 증가하였고, 간접흡연 비노출 군에 비해 주 5일 이상 노출된 집단에서 1.1배 증가하였다. 현재 천식 발생 확률은 비흡연자에 비해 일 1개비 이하 흡연자 1.39배, 일 2~9개비 흡연자 1.38배, 일 10개비 이상 흡연자에게서 2.82배 증가하였고, 간접흡연 비노출 군에 비해 주 5일 이상 노출된 집단에서 1.27배 증가하였다.;This research is aimed at measuring the effect of active smoking and SHS (second-hand smoke) on wheezing and asthma among Korean adolescents by using data from the 2011 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey. Of a total of 75,643 students analysed, about 40% were exposed to SHS, 12% were current smokers, and 9% were those who had been diagnosed with asthma From the result of logistic regression analysis to examine the effect of active smoking and SHS on wheezing and asthma in this study, the amount of smoking and the amount of SHS were significant factors for “wheezing ever”, “current wheezing”, “asthma ever”, and “current asthma”. The possibility of “wheezing ever” increased significantly according to the amount of smoking (less than 1 cigarette/day OR=1.24, 2∼9 cigarettes/day OR=1.61, more than 10 cigarettes/day OR=2.11) compared with non-smokers and according to the amount of SHS (1∼4 days/week OR=1.16, more than 5 days/week OR=1.30) compared with non-SHS. The possibility of current wheezing increased significantly according to the amount of smoking (less than 1 cigarette/day OR=1.45, 2∼9 cigarettes/day OR=2.12, more than 10 cigarettes/day OR=3.13) compared with non-smokers and according to the amount of SHS (1∼4 days/week OR=1.11, more than 5 days/week OR=1.39) compared with non-SHS. The amount of smoking (more than 10 cigarettes/day vs. non-smokers OR=1.37) and the amount of SHS (more than 5days/week vs. not SHS OR=1.10) effected significantly on the possibility of asthma ever. The amount of smoking (less than 1 cigarette/day vs. non-smokers OR=1.39, 2∼9 cigarettes/day OR=1.38, more than 10 cigarettes/day OR=2.82) and the amount of SHS (more than 5 days/week vs. not SHS OR=1.27) influenced significantly on the possibility of current asthma. In conclusion, adolescents’s smoking and SHS can raise the possibility of wheezing and asthma. Therefore, policy makers need to enforce policies that help adolescents prevent from exposing to SHS including homes and public places like PC rooms, parks, bus stops and streets as well as quit smoking.
최근 자원으로서의 시간에 대한 개인의 인식은 인간의 생활을 영위하는 기초적 단위로서 시간의 가치활용도를 높이고 인간관계의 맥락을 심화시키며, 그들의 「삶의 질」을 극대화하는 핵심적인 가치를 부여하는데 초점을 맞추고 있다. 그렇지만 어느 누구에게나 정해져 있는 시간의 양(quantity)을 어떻게 효율적으로 사용하고, 필요한 분야 및 항목에 얼마나 배분하는가에 따라 시간의 질(quality)을 증대시킬 수 있다. 본 연구는 1999년 통계청에서 처음으로 실시한 자료를 심층 분석하는 것이다. 연구목적은 기혼여성의 혼인상태 및 사회경제적 특성에 따라 생활시간 배분이 어떻게 상이한지를 분석하고 문제점을 찾으며, 아울러 효율적 시간활용방안을 제시하고 정책적 지원방안도 함께 모색하는데 있다. 주요 결과는 우리나라 기혼여성의 생활시간 배분은 혼인상태에 따라 현저한 차이가 있었다는 점이다. 아울러 기혼여성의 경제활동여부도 생활시간 배분에 영향을 크게 미치고 있었다. 특히 이혼부인은 생계유지를 위하여 경제활동에 적극 참여해야 하기 때문에 적절한 시간배분에 문제점을 노출시키고 있었다. 이와 같은 일련의 분석연구는 우리나라 부인의 혼인상태, 연령, 경제활동참여 및 직업유형 등의 특성에 따라 생활방식과 삶의 질을 파악하고, 시간자원을 효율적으로 활용하는 데 필요한 기초자료로 제공될 수 있을 것이며, 궁극적으로 여성의 「삶의 질」을 향상시키는 데 기여할 것으로 사료된다.;Individual's view of time as resource has recently been geared toward making the best use of time as the basic unit of human life in order to deepen the context of interpersonal relationships and maximize quality of life. The quality of one's time can be enhanced depending on how efficiently one allocate, manage, and spend the quantity of time. The present study aims to conduct an in depth examination of the first time-allocation survey carried out in Korea by the National Statistical Office in 1999 and analyze differences and identify problems in time allocation among married women according to their marital status and socioeconomic characteristics. Along the way, strategic plans and policy implications are suggested for improving the efficiency of time allocation. Major findings can be summarized as follows. Patterns of time allocation among married women in Korea vary widely depending on their marital status. The largest portion of their time in general is spent on ‘self-care’ which includes time allocated for sleep. However, divorced women are found to spend the next largest portion of their time on work, while widowed women and women with spouse spend the second largest portion their time on 'leisure and friends/acquaintances'. Divorced women are found to spend significantly more time at work than widowed women and women with spouse do. This is presumably a result stemming from the fact that divorced women, unlike women with spouse present, are highly responsible for household livelihood not only because they do not have income-earning husbands, but also because they are generally younger than their widowed counterparts and therefore are less likely to have income-earning children. Divorced and widowed women in their thirties/forties as compared with other groups are found to spend much more time on work. This may be not only because they unlike women with spouse present－must fulfill their responsibilities and role as the main breadwinner for the family, but also because they are more likely to have school-aged children and are responsible for earning money for bringing up and educating them. Unemployed women, regardless of their marital status, are found to spend more time on household and family care than employed women. This implies that there is an accentuated policy need for paying particular heed to social support toward helping divorced women balance their work and family lives. Koreans in general－irrespective of socio-demographic factors such as gender, age, educational level, marital status, and employment status－are found to devote little time to voluntary activities, even during weekends or holidays. Non-working women and elderly people, in particular, spend very limited amount of time participating in voluntary activities despite having relatively much spare time. Divorced and widowed women as compared to women with spouse are found to suffer from lack of time to care for their preschool children due to other obligations. This calls for more policy attention to be placed on the protection of physical and emotional health of children in these female-headed households. For instance, the availability/accessibility of desired services should be ensured through the expansion of home-helper programs, educare centers, and financial aid programs. Based on these results, the following time management strategies and policy options can be considered. First, more time needs to be allocated, especially in the case of married non-working women, to voluntary activities. This can be made possible by reducing time spent on friends/acquaintances, leisure activities, and self-care. Second, it is hard for many divorced and widowed women to allocate much time to household and family care because they are responsible for engaging in income-earning activities. Therefore, social support should be provided to enhance the availability and accessibility of home-helper programs and daycare services. Third, cultural/leisure programs should be developed for working married women who generally have little or no time for leisure and interpersonal relationships. Forth, the longstanding inequalities in gender roles must be redressed. To do this would require men to escape from their traditional ‘male gender role’ and assume an increased, if not equal, role in household tasks and family care.
본 연구의 목적은 우리나라 인구의 1/4이 거주하는 서울시에서 건강수준의 불평등과 관련된 지표를 이용하여 사회계층간 건강수준의 차이를 대표성 높은 서울시민보건지표조사 자료를 이용하여 실증적으로 분석하고, 유병수준과 관련된 사회경제적 요인과 건강행태 요인들의 영향을 분석하고자 하였다. 연구자료는 2001년 서울시민보건지표조사 자료로서 2,500개 조사구에서 조사된 25~64세 인구 16,180명을 대상으로 하였다. 통계분석은 다변량 로지스틱 회귀분석을 이용하였다. 건강수준으로는 만성질환 유무와 주관적 건강수준의 두가지 유병수준 지표를 선정하였으며, 사회계층변수로는 교육수준, 가구 월소득수준, 직업유형을, 건행태요인으로는 흡연, 음주, 비만, 운동, 아침식사 결식여부, 수면적절성 등의 6가지 변수를 선정하였다. 연구 결과 남녀 모두 낮은 교육수준, 낮은 소득수준, 낮은 직업계층의 집단에서 만성질환 유병의 위험도와 주관적 건강수준이 나쁠 위험도가 뚜렷하게 증가하였다. 남녀 모두 사회계층 변수 중 교육수준이 만성질환과 주관적 건강수준에 미치는 영향이 컸다. 사회계층 요인과 건강행태 요인이 모두 유병수준에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나 사회계층 요인의 영향이 더욱 컸다. 주관적 건강상태는 만성질환에서 보다 사회계층에 따른 불평등도가 더욱 컸으며, 남자가 여자에 비하여 사회계층에 따른 주관적 건강상태의 불평등도가 심하였다. 결론적으로 우리나라 서울시 인구집단에서 사회계층간 만성질환과 주관적 건강수준에서 상당한 불평등이 존재하는 것으로 파악되었다.;This study aims to investigate socioeconomic differences in morbidity in Seoul Metropolitan. The study consists of a representative sample of 16,180 adult men and women aged 20~64 who participated in the 2001 Seoul Citizens’ Health Interview Survey. This population-based crosssectional survey data was used to investigate the effects of education, income and occupation on the prevalence of self-reported chronic illness from all causes and self-rated health. To estimate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of self-reported chronic illness and self-rated health a multiple logistic analysis was conducted. For both men and women, the study shows that socioeconomic position(SEP) is strongly related with risk of self-reported chronic illness and self-rated health at all levels of the SEP hierarchy, that is, lower education and income led to a significant increase in morbidity. After controlling for age and 6 health behavioral risk factors(duration of smoking, alcohol drinking, relative body weight, physical activity, skipping breakfast and sleeping pattern), the odds ratio of self-reported chronic illness for men was 1.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49- 2.47), for women 1.89 (95% CI, 1.54-2.32) among those with the lowesteducated group compared to the highest-educated group. When household income was considered, after controlling for age and 6 behavioral risk factors, the odds ratio of chronic diseases for men was 1.12 (95% CI 0.93-1.35), and for women 1.62 (95% CI 1.39-1.89) among those in the lowest-income group compared to the highest-income group. The odds ratio of self-rated health after controlling for age and 6 behavioral risk factors was 2.41 (95% CI, 1.78-3.25) for men, 2.05 (95% CI, 1.63-2.58) for women among those with the lowest-educated group compared to the highest-educated group. When household income was considered, after controlling for age and 6 behavioral risk factors, the odds ratio of self-rated health for men was 1.63 (95% CI 1.25-2.13), and 1.32 (95% CI, 1.09-1.58) for women among those in the lowest-income group compared to the highest-income group. This study finds that there exist large socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity in Seoul Metropolitan area. To be more specific, socioeconomic differences for men are larger in self-rated health, but smaller in chronic illness than women. Also, the effect of education is stronger than that of income for both men and women. The study results are similar to previous studies on social inequalities in health status for Korea and other developed countries.